Independent CTO-led review for software companies

Know what to fix, rebuild, or stop.

Get an independent recommendation and a practical 90-day plan for one expensive product or platform decision in 10 working days.

Fixed fee · 10 working days · Led personally by the founder

Best fit
Software leaders with one decision this quarter
Timeline
10 working days
Engagement
Fixed scope and fee agreed up front
Deliverables
Recommendation and practical 90-day plan

Call Spanwork before you approve the wrong fix.

Bring one decision that is holding up a customer promise, roadmap, rewrite, or major technology spend.

Repair it
or replace it?

The product is getting harder to change, delivery keeps slowing down, and nobody agrees whether targeted repairs or a rewrite will solve it.

Promise it
or test it first?

A major customer or product commitment is on the table, but the team is not sure the current platform can support it safely.

What should
we fix first?

Leadership knows change is needed, but the order, owners, budget, and acceptable risk are still unclear.

Also useful after a leadership change, acquisition, or vendor handoff, before a larger plan is approved.

The Product and Technology Review

One important question in. A clear answer out.

A recommendation, the reasoning behind it, and a practical 90-day plan. Delivered in 10 working days, with a leadership readout to agree on the next move.

An illustrative sample, not client work. Your Review is scoped around your decision.

You keep the recommendation and plan. No follow-on engagement required.

SpanworkDecision memo

Should the team begin a full platform rewrite before committing to enterprise identity and audit controls?

Do not begin the
full rewrite yet.

Separate identity and audit responsibilities, test the integration boundary, and measure one release cycle before approving the larger program.

Repair
Contain the constraint.
Rebuild
Replace the platform.
Resequence
Test the boundary first.
Illustrative sample · Not a client case study
SpanworkConstraint map

Connect the promise,
the system, and the owner.

  1. Product commitment

    Enterprise identity controls and a reliable audit trail before launch.

  2. Platform constraint

    Identity and audit responsibilities share an untested boundary.

  3. Decision owner

    Name the leader responsible for the decision and the team that will operate it.

What could change the answer? Test failure, rollback, and data behavior before the next commitment.

Illustrative sample · Not a client case study
Spanwork90-day plan

Make the next
commitment earn its evidence.

  1. Days 0-30

    Define and instrument

    Name the owners. Document the boundaries. Agree on the test.

  2. Days 31-60

    Test the constrained path

    Run the smallest complete test. Observe one representative release.

  3. Days 61-90

    Decide and sequence

    Compare the findings. Choose the next scope, owners, and accepted risks.

Leadership readoutApprove / Narrow / Defer / Stop

Illustrative sample · Not a client case study

See the work before you contact us.

Read a sample recommendation and review Jose's current product and platform work at Micr. Both are clearly labeled, and neither is client work.

Current product work

Jose makes these decisions in an operating company.

As CTO at Micr, Jose leads product direction, UX, architecture, and infrastructure for an active social gaming product.

Role
CTO
Current focus
Reliability, recovery, observability, security, and operating cost
See Jose's Micr work

Independent recommendation

The Review does not assume a rewrite or new project.

It may recommend a repair, replacement, focused test, different order of work, or no major investment yet.

  • The Review is complete on its own.
  • Your team keeps the recommendation and plan.
  • Any follow-on work is a separate choice.
Open the sample Review

How the 10 working days work.

We agree on the question, review the relevant facts, test the riskiest assumption, and tell leadership what to do next.

  1. Days 1-2

    Define the decision

    Name the exact question, deadline, business stakes, and person responsible for the final call.

  2. Days 3-6

    Review the facts

    Examine the relevant roadmap, customer requirements, architecture, delivery history, incidents, and responsibilities.

  3. Days 7-8

    Check the riskiest assumption

    Focus on the unknown most likely to change the recommendation.

  4. Days 9-10

    Recommend the next move

    Deliver the decision, tradeoffs, owners, checkpoints, and a practical 90-day plan.

Your Review is led by the person you hire.

Jose Alvarado runs every working session, reviews the evidence, and writes the final recommendation.

Jose Alvarado

Founder, Spanwork Product and platform engineer

Black-and-white thermal-print portrait of Jose Alvarado.

Jose is the founder of Spanwork and CTO at Micr. He leads product direction, UX, architecture, and infrastructure for an active software product.

His published work spans social gaming and household product safety, with responsibilities across application systems, data, cloud infrastructure, security, reliability, recovery, and operating cost. That range helps him connect technical choices to delivery, customer commitments, and business risk.

Current role
CTO at Micr
Based in
South Bay, Los Angeles
Working range
Product direction, UX, full-stack systems, cloud, security, and product economics
Review delivery
Led personally from first session to final recommendation

Practical notes for difficult software decisions.

Read how to choose between repair and rewrite, test an enterprise promise, and get stalled roadmap work moving.

View all insights

Is the Review a good fit?

Good fit

  • Your company has a live software product and a team responsible for it.
  • Leadership must make one product or platform decision within the next 90 days.
  • Product, engineering, and the final decision owner can participate.
  • You want an honest recommendation, including a smaller option or "not yet."

Not a fit

  • You already chose the solution and only need more developers.
  • You need emergency incident response or day-to-day support.
  • The people with decision authority cannot participate.
  • You need a broad compliance audit or general maturity assessment.

What happens after the Review?

The recommendation stands on its own. Any follow-on work is optional and scoped separately.

Typical timeline: 4 to 8 weeks

Decision Sprint

Test one remaining unknown through a focused prototype, technical investigation, or delivery plan.

Ongoing support

Fractional Technology Lead

Add part-time technical leadership while the team executes the plan, manages vendors, or hires a permanent lead.

Tell Jose what your team needs to decide.

Send the question, the deadline, what is at risk, and what you have already tried. Jose will tell you whether the Review fits.

A short summary is enough. Do not send confidential code, credentials, customer data, or system access through this form.

If there is a fit, the next step is a short conversation. You receive the scope, timeline, deliverables, access requirements, and fixed fee in writing before deciding.

hello@spanwork.net Use the protected inquiry

Fields marked are required.

We use these details and session referral information to reply and evaluate fit. Read the information collected notice.